Smart or Shallow? Postplagiarism, Trust, and the Future of Learning with GenAI
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
This presentation examines the role of GenAI in the postplagiarism era, where the challenge is no longer whether AI should be used but how it shapes learning. Drawing on Eaton’s (2023) framework of postplagiarism, Krakauer’s distinction between complementary and competitive cognitive artifacts, and Mayer et al.’s (1995) model of trust, the talk explores student perspectives on AI use, the asymmetries of trust between students, educators, and employers, and the risks of over-reliance. The implications highlight a shift toward the responsible integration of AI, urging educators to design practices where AI complements human intelligence rather than competes with it.
Description
This presentation examines how generative AI challenges education in the postplagiarism era. It explores whether AI functions as a complementary or competitive artifact, highlights the role of cognitive and affective trust, and considers the pedagogical practices needed to guide learners toward responsible and meaningful use of AI.
Citation
Kumar, R. (2025, October 1). Smart or shallow? Postplagiarism, trust, and the future of learning with GenAI. Postplagiarism Speaker Series. CAIELI, University of Calgary. URL